Workplace Drug Testing Issues – Massachusetts State Laws
These categories do not affect DOT-regulated drug testing. Government employers should always call for potential additional restrictions on employee drug testing.
Deny Unemployment claims – Chapter 151A Section 25
Drug Testing Issue | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|
Instant or POCT Testing | No restrictions | |
Drug Panels | No restrictions | |
Laboratory | No restrictions | |
Random Testing | Restricted | Limit to safety-sensitive or security-sensitive position. |
Post-Accident | Restrictions | Massachusetts employers should only conduct post-accident drug testing when they believe the individual caused or contributed to the accident. |
Reasonable Suspicion | No restrictions | |
Oral Fluids | No restrictions | |
Hair Testing | No restrictions | |
Unemployment Denial | Yes | Chapter 151A Section 25 – Disqualification of benefits when the employee discharged for deliberate misconduct consisting of: (i) stealing from such employee’s place of employment; (ii) illegal drug use while at work; or (iii) drunkenness while at work shall be determined to be ineligible for benefits without regard to whether or not the employer had a written policy against such conduct. |
Workers Comp Discount | No | |
Intoxication Defense | Maybe | No current statute or case law addressing Workers’ Compensation/Denial after a positive drug or alcohol test after an accident. |
Medical Marijuana | Yes | Nothing in the law requires any accommodation of any on-site medical use of marijuana in any place of employment. |
Recreational Marijuana | Yes | Passed November 2016, the law does not affect employer’s rights to enact and enforce workplace policies restricting the consumption of marijuana by employees. |
Report Driver DOT Positives | No | |
General Statute | Massachusetts legislation does not address drug testing in private employment. Case law limits random testing – the validity of an employer’s policy of random drug testing had to be weighed on a case-by-case basis, taking into account the employee’s job responsibilities and the employer’s interests. |
Regarding medical marijuana, Massachusetts is a state with explicit employee protection:
- there is nothing in this law that requires any accommodation of any on-site medical use of marijuana in any place of employment; (law silent on off-duty use)
- no punishment under state law for qualifying patients;” provides “protection from state prosecution and penalties
- any person meeting the requirements under this law shall not be penalized under Massachusetts law in any manner or denied any right or privilege for such actions
Intoxication Defense – Denial of Workers Compensation Claim – States vary in their willingness to allow employers to use an injured worker’s intoxication against a compensation claim. State laws’ intoxication defenses generally fall into one of three rough categories: reasons that do not depend on causation; defenses that require some form of proximate causation between intoxication and injury; and defenses that require that intoxication be the sole cause of injury. Always check with your insurance company and attorney when you have a positive post-accident test after an injury.
This chart is intended for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon for legal guidance. State and local law vary greatly; therefore, you are advised to consult experienced legal counsel during the design of your actual substance abuse testing program and with any questions that follow.